<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Comics Daily</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alternatecover.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alternatecover.com</link>
	<description>A new comic review EVERY weekday!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 14:58:55 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on CLiNT #1 by Matthew Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.alternatecover.com/2010/09/02/clint-1/comment-page-1/#comment-49742</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 14:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternatecover.com/?p=2182#comment-49742</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re only reprints to the people who go into comic shops, though. Or, if we&#039;re being pedantic, to the people who, unlike me, bought Turf and/or Nemesis (and/or will buy Kick-Ass) in a comic shop.

I thought it was ooookkkaaaayy. The comics I buy from Tesco/WHSmith are not the comics I buy from Another World, or for that matter, the comics I buy from Waterstones/The Works/Poundland. When I&#039;m down, or on the train, I can see this being the sort of thing I might have a punt on - for the money, it&#039;s not bad. Gives me another option, besides The Meg and The Simpsons.

Although...duhh...jumping into the middle of a story...hmm.

//\Oo/\\</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re only reprints to the people who go into comic shops, though. Or, if we&#8217;re being pedantic, to the people who, unlike me, bought Turf and/or Nemesis (and/or will buy Kick-Ass) in a comic shop.</p>
<p>I thought it was ooookkkaaaayy. The comics I buy from Tesco/WHSmith are not the comics I buy from Another World, or for that matter, the comics I buy from Waterstones/The Works/Poundland. When I&#8217;m down, or on the train, I can see this being the sort of thing I might have a punt on &#8211; for the money, it&#8217;s not bad. Gives me another option, besides The Meg and The Simpsons.</p>
<p>Although&#8230;duhh&#8230;jumping into the middle of a story&#8230;hmm.</p>
<p>//\Oo/\\</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CLiNT #1 by Retail Therapy</title>
		<link>http://www.alternatecover.com/2010/09/02/clint-1/comment-page-1/#comment-49696</link>
		<dc:creator>Retail Therapy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 05:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternatecover.com/?p=2182#comment-49696</guid>
		<description>Hey there! enjoying the blog. I tried signing up for your feed and it didn&#039;t. Just informing you. Take care! =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there! enjoying the blog. I tried signing up for your feed and it didn&#8217;t. Just informing you. Take care! =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CLiNT #1 by Dom</title>
		<link>http://www.alternatecover.com/2010/09/02/clint-1/comment-page-1/#comment-49663</link>
		<dc:creator>Dom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 19:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternatecover.com/?p=2182#comment-49663</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, not good.

I had planned to pick this up tomorrow, but I&#039;m not sure I want to now. Couple of reprinted comics and a preview of one that I&#039;ll be buying when it comes out + it sounds from your review like the rest is crap. Shame really. Still, be interesting to see how it sells. I reckon it might do quite well.

What do you chaps make of Dodgem Logic? That&#039;s got the opposite problem to Clint - ie LONG waffling articles. But there are the occasional nuggets in there (Moore&#039;s own essays are always worth a read)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, not good.</p>
<p>I had planned to pick this up tomorrow, but I&#8217;m not sure I want to now. Couple of reprinted comics and a preview of one that I&#8217;ll be buying when it comes out + it sounds from your review like the rest is crap. Shame really. Still, be interesting to see how it sells. I reckon it might do quite well.</p>
<p>What do you chaps make of Dodgem Logic? That&#8217;s got the opposite problem to Clint &#8211; ie LONG waffling articles. But there are the occasional nuggets in there (Moore&#8217;s own essays are always worth a read)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Sunday Pages #29 by Sanjuana Queja</title>
		<link>http://www.alternatecover.com/2008/10/05/the-sunday-pages-29/comment-page-1/#comment-48811</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanjuana Queja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternatecover.com/?p=831#comment-48811</guid>
		<description>Sick and tired of obtaining low numbers of useless traffic to your website? Well i want to inform you of a brand new underground tactic which makes myself $900  daily on 100% AUTOPILOT. I possibly could be here all day and going into detail but why dont you just check their site out? There is a great video that explains everything. So if your seriously interested in making hassle-free cash this is the site for you. &lt;a href=&quot;http://tiny.cc/p7mq4&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Auto Traffic Avalanche&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sick and tired of obtaining low numbers of useless traffic to your website? Well i want to inform you of a brand new underground tactic which makes myself $900  daily on 100% AUTOPILOT. I possibly could be here all day and going into detail but why dont you just check their site out? There is a great video that explains everything. So if your seriously interested in making hassle-free cash this is the site for you. <a href="http://tiny.cc/p7mq4" rel="nofollow">Auto Traffic Avalanche</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dusting Off : Ghostbusters : Legion #1 (April 2004) by George Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.alternatecover.com/2008/03/19/dusting-off-ghostbusters-legion-1-april-2004/comment-page-1/#comment-48697</link>
		<dc:creator>George Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 04:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsdaily.wordpress.com/?p=267#comment-48697</guid>
		<description>i can say that Dan Aykroyd is a very good comedian just like Jim Carrey`~*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i can say that Dan Aykroyd is a very good comedian just like Jim Carrey`~*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scott Pilgrim vs. Comics Daily: Part Three by Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World Review &#187; Your English is Good</title>
		<link>http://www.alternatecover.com/2010/08/26/scott-pilgrim-vs-comics-daily-part-three/comment-page-1/#comment-48671</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World Review &#187; Your English is Good</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 01:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternatecover.com/?p=2175#comment-48671</guid>
		<description>[...] Also, if you&#8217;re a complete masochist who isn&#8217;t completely sick of the phrase &#8220;Scott Pilgrim&#8221;, you head on over to Alternate Cover, my comics blog, and read three in-depth discussions between myself and my co-writer Seb Patrick about how the movies and books stack up against one another, what we liked, and what we didn&#8217;t like. Warning: It will be nerdy. Part One covers Scott Pilgrim&#8217;s Relationships, Part Two covers Gideon&#8217;s Machinations, and Part Three covers, well&#8230; a lot of stuff, but in particular, The Adaptation. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Also, if you&#8217;re a complete masochist who isn&#8217;t completely sick of the phrase &#8220;Scott Pilgrim&#8221;, you head on over to Alternate Cover, my comics blog, and read three in-depth discussions between myself and my co-writer Seb Patrick about how the movies and books stack up against one another, what we liked, and what we didn&#8217;t like. Warning: It will be nerdy. Part One covers Scott Pilgrim&#8217;s Relationships, Part Two covers Gideon&#8217;s Machinations, and Part Three covers, well&#8230; a lot of stuff, but in particular, The Adaptation. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scott Pilgrim vs. Comics Daily: Part Two by Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World Review &#187; Your English is Good</title>
		<link>http://www.alternatecover.com/2010/08/25/scott-pilgrim-vs-comics-daily-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-48492</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World Review &#187; Your English is Good</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 14:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternatecover.com/?p=2169#comment-48492</guid>
		<description>[...] Warning: It will be nerdy. Part One covers Scott Pilgrim&#8217;s Relationships, Part Two covers Gideon&#8217;s Machinations, and Part Three covers, well&#8230; a lot of stuff, but in particular, The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Warning: It will be nerdy. Part One covers Scott Pilgrim&#8217;s Relationships, Part Two covers Gideon&#8217;s Machinations, and Part Three covers, well&#8230; a lot of stuff, but in particular, The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scott Pilgrim vs. Comics Daily: Part One by Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World Review (Den of Geek) &#187; Your English is Good</title>
		<link>http://www.alternatecover.com/2010/08/24/scott-pilgrim-vs-comics-daily-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-48491</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World Review (Den of Geek) &#187; Your English is Good</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 14:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternatecover.com/?p=2163#comment-48491</guid>
		<description>[...] another, what we liked, and what we didn&#8217;t like. Warning: It will be nerdy. Part One covers Scott Pilgrim&#8217;s Relationships, Part Two covers Gideon&#8217;s Machinations, and Part Three covers, well&#8230; a lot of stuff, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] another, what we liked, and what we didn&#8217;t like. Warning: It will be nerdy. Part One covers Scott Pilgrim&#8217;s Relationships, Part Two covers Gideon&#8217;s Machinations, and Part Three covers, well&#8230; a lot of stuff, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ash vs Britain: 2000AD Prog 1681 by India News</title>
		<link>http://www.alternatecover.com/2010/04/21/ash-vs-britain-2000ad-prog-1681/comment-page-1/#comment-48433</link>
		<dc:creator>India News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 05:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternatecover.com/?p=1963#comment-48433</guid>
		<description>hey, i do not feel in any like this nevertheless, you create excellent point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey, i do not feel in any like this nevertheless, you create excellent point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scott Pilgrim vs. Comics Daily: Part Three by Matthew Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.alternatecover.com/2010/08/26/scott-pilgrim-vs-comics-daily-part-three/comment-page-1/#comment-48338</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 17:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternatecover.com/?p=2175#comment-48338</guid>
		<description>I cerrtainly missed Lynette Guycott - the brief cameo had me hungry for more (really! Did you SEE her? Now that was an interesting-looking human being!).

I didn&#039;t have a problem with Todd the evil dick punching Knives, funnily enough. He was an evil dick!

(nobody in my screening seemed to, either. I was actively shutting the dirty urchin bastards out, mind.)

//\Oo/\\</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cerrtainly missed Lynette Guycott &#8211; the brief cameo had me hungry for more (really! Did you SEE her? Now that was an interesting-looking human being!).</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t have a problem with Todd the evil dick punching Knives, funnily enough. He was an evil dick!</p>
<p>(nobody in my screening seemed to, either. I was actively shutting the dirty urchin bastards out, mind.)</p>
<p>//\Oo/\\</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
